Bad Idea Time: Safeties should be worth 11 points

Photo by Al Messerschmidt/Getty Images. Banner Society illustration.

A safety should be worth more than a touchdown. This feels obvious.

Safeties are much rarer than TDs, for starters.

For every non-garbage time FBS drive that ended in a safety between 2007 and 2019, about 133 ended in touchdowns, according to data from Brian Fremeau, who pulled from more than 220,000 possessions. About 27% of drives end in a TD, and 0.2% end in a safety.

Safeties are also more difficult to score than TDs.

A field goal is rarer than a TD, too, by a little more than 50%. But a field goal isn’t harder to get than a touchdown. If you fail to score a touchdown, a field goal is usually the easy fallback.

A safety is different. It requires your offense, defense, and/or special teams to work together to create great field position. Then it requires you to get a tackle for loss or force a fumble through the end zone at a time when the opposing team is on DEFCON 1 to prevent you from doing that.

In other sports, hard and rare achievements are especially rewarded. Yet safeties continue to be undervalued.

Grand slams are worth more runs than solo homers. A shot from outside the arc is worth more than one from inside.

A safety being worth two points is like if a half-court shot were only worth one, or if you got max points in Skee-Ball for rolling the ball into the farthest outer ring. Any seven-year-old in an arcade could tell you that’s nonsense.

Even though a safety earns you the ball back, the play remains far less valuable than a TD. The average drive nets 2.1 points, meaning a safety’s worth an average of about four points. The post-safety drive still makes a safety worth about three points less than a touchdown.

That’s absurd, given how hard safeties are to pull off. Touchdown drives are hard, but they still happen at least once or twice a game for even the worst teams. Conversely, even the best team might not score a safety all year.

Why this value discrepancy? There’s no clear reason.

In 1893, Walter Camp published his Book of College Sports, the foundation for the modern rulebook. Camp explained the concept of a safety ...

A “safety” is made when a side are so sorely pressed that they carry the ball behind their own goal line, and not when it is kicked there by the enemy.

... and said a safety would be worth two points, but never elaborated on why. It’s particularly curious because Camp was discussing how score values for different plays had changed over time. Touchdowns had been two, four, and five. Kicking conversions had been four, two, and one. But safeties have held steady at two since 1883.

We have a rule that doesn’t make statistical sense, has no obvious historic ground, and – most importantly – isn’t much fun. The rule should change.

Behold the answer: Make the safety worth 11 points.

  1. It has to be really valuable, because it’s really rare and really difficult.
  2. The most unusual scoring play becomes a lot more fun if the scoreboard treats it as such.
  3. But it has to be reasonable, because you don’t want the game to effectively end on a safety.
  4. For maximum fun, it has to be a prime number, because football is already based around threes and sevens. If a team gives up a safety, you don’t want them to get even with a mere field goal or two. If the team allowing the safety scores a touchdown, make them go for two in order to get back within a field goal. Part of the penalty for giving up a safety is that your coach now has to be bold, making the incentive not to surrender one even stronger.

The ramifications of the 11-POINT SAFETY are many, and they are dazzling.

Suddenly, the offense’s objective might not be to score a touchdown.

If a team is down 10 in the last few minutes, are they still trying to score seven? Maybe not, especially if they’re running low on timeouts.

In this situation, a different path to victory is to somehow give the other team the ball back as close to the goal line as possible. Maybe this means going out at the one on fourth-and-goal. Maybe it means fumbling intentionally. The trailing team wants the opponent to take the ball as far back as possible, creating a possible safety.

The defense knows the offense wants 11 points, so coverages will get crafty.

Here’s a real red-zone defensive formation from Alabama:

Here’s a red-zone defensive formation from Alabama if Nick Saban’s only goal were to not let the other team stop at the one-yard line:

Look at that realistic formation. Are you not entertained?

The coffin corner punt suddenly becomes even more valuable.

It’s preposterously hard to drop a punt out of bounds at the one- or two-yard line against a rush. It’s why college and pro punters almost never try, instead lofting their shorter-distance punts high in the air to force a fair catch around the 10.

But with the 11-point safety in effect, the coffin corner is a nuclear missile. The punting game will become high-stakes target practice. If the Big Ten knows what’s good for it, everyone in that league will relentlessly advocate for this reform.

Does this mean a team trailing by nine might punt on second-and-goal from inside the 10?

Yeah, it definitely puts that in play. This post is called Bad Idea Time.

Also, the INTENTIONAL SAFETY will wither and die.

Every year, a few teams decide that instead of risking a blocked punt or a fumble, they’ll have a player run out of his own end zone for a safety. Bill Belichick is one of many NFL coaches to do it successfully. In 2007, Pitt finished off the most shocking rivalry upset ever by having the punter step over his own end line while leading by six:

That was a funny way for a sub-.500 team to ruin a rival’s championship dreams. But if you want max fun, you want teams to have to risk a blocked punt or a bad snap in key moments. If a safety cost 11 points, teams would be forced to chance it.

Could we take this exercise to a logical conclusion and simply make the penalty for giving up a safety a forfeit?

That’s not what I’m proposing here. It’s a whole different idea. But if you only want to watch the world burn, then forfeit via safety is merely a form of natural selection.


have safeties be -11 points for the offensive team

just to add to the embarassment

Kirk Ferentz says fuck you

6-4 with an intentional safety was magical

let the record show that it was really 6-22

While the loss of the intentional safety might sadden ol Kirk, he can now punt freely on first-and-goal. He’ll be fine.

Honestly the first thing I thought about when I read this was how much Ferentz would integrate this rule into his gameplan

a real game changer for his punting strategy

The king of the "punt" formation

Not only am I completely and thoroughly on board with this idea, but I want to extend it for other weird plays.

  • Blocking a PAT and returning it to the opposite end zone is currently also worth 2 points, which is completely bananas. That should be a minimum of 6, but I’d argue it should be up there in the 11-ish stratosphere as well.
  • Similarly, blocking a PAT and getting tacked in your own end zone is currently worth 1 point to your opponent. This should be inflated as well, and I’d pitch that it should remain about half the above bullet point.
  • Hitting the uprights on a PAT should be worth 2 if the ball then passes through the uprights, 0 if it does not.
  • Hitting the uprights on a FG should be worth 6 if the ball then passes through the uprights, 0 if it does not.
  • Fat guy touchdowns need to be worth more, in general. All we need to do is scale the point of the touchdown with the weight of the player. Defensive touchdowns are worth a based of 6 points, but players weighing 300 lbs or more score an additional point, and they score an extra additional point for every 20 lbs over 300 on their official roster weight. (300 lbs = 7 pts, 320 lbs = 8 pts, 340 lbs = 9 pts, etc)
  • Related to the above, the opposing team will have the right to challenge the weight of a player after a fat guy touchdown. The player will be required to strip (behind a tasteful curtain, of course) and step on a scale. Each team may send one doctor to verify the weight. If the weight is egregiously off the listed weight (more than 2 bonus points) then the points are taken from the defensive team and awarded back to the offensive team. However, the defensive player must be given an opportunity to restore his weight to the advertised level by eating as much food of any type as he wants for no more than five minutes.
  • Dunking your coach in Gatorade is fine as is. Dunking the other coach in Gatorade should be worth 2 points. This play can be scored whenever the clock is running, and it can be scored multiple times per game.

yeah let’s just do it all. the consequences do not scare me.

Fun idea but here’s one that we could really sell

Having specialists come into the game to kick is ridiculous. The whole game often hangs on who can hire the best subcontractor. To be eligible to kick the ball, you should be required to have been on the field for your team’s previous play. You could still choose to have a placekicking specialist, but you’d need to find a place on the field to put him on third down just in case you need him on fourth down. The only exceptions would be the opening kickoffs of each half.

They basically did this for the first 70 years of football and … hey yeah, why not.

What would the ramifications have been for the "Baby I'm Burning" masterpiece game?

Actually, I think it would have been prime Tubs to need a defensive safety in order to win a game, so probably not much different.

This was Ryan’s first question when I suggested this idea.

It would be glorious if an offense fumbled the ball in their own end zone.

Both teams would studiously avoid falling on the ball. You’d see teams of offensive lineman try to grab some scrawny defensive back by the arms to drag him over to the ball and close his hands onto it to force possession.

Football needs more chaos like this imo

I’m always Team Chaos.

I want to see teams punting on first down late in the 4th quarter while LEADING by 10.

Kirk Ferentz just got hard

Kirk Ferentz would absolutely run the all-safety offense

Oh baby, the punting game just got a boost


Otherwise how would we get that idea Miss St/Auburn perfect 3-2 game?

View All Comments
Back to top ↑